r
inflict
a weeks colitan simpsonment confinement which he considers would
exercise the same
flogging upon maker,
17191 further
deterrent effect as
puts forward (2)
L'
f
recommendation # that the ordinay punishment of whipping with a birch
the breach hould be extended to
may 1
the lesser forms of
the Govenor in-Camil
crime wherever
consider
may
the prevalence of crime has reached abronnel forecast porportions
with regard to
Sir F. Fugard has had his
draft Ordinance
news embodied in a
which he has submitted. I thoroughly
agree
with him
as
regards (1) (a) 4
((); it seems time that with be too severe a punchment for the founs which kindwaffing
among
with
Takes
Chinere offenders. But
CA
the quotes it
regard to (2), the extension of whipping, he is notquite concretent
par 6" of his deep. If the #627th without expre Feb (10334/11) be endorses
I'u
a remast
the sufit of the yard that ordinary
the
Miffy,
M
notice of
Chinest
Mininals
any crews? 10
fun
and I rather doubt the effect of.
ges final using the suffreed fruit utility of reserving for final resort the 13
power
No. Su claume
-news sie of (44).
q
KA
to authorise
a
penaltyd
aunch doubtful deterrent effect, (in spite of the Junion expressed the Second Police Magistrate). After all, whiffing defends much more the imprisonment for the inmediate effect it produces, for if unfinishment
effe propical effect upon the prisoner, it at least prevents him from dory mischief while he is 1 "confined. (This statement of finion is however based upon Sir F. Luzard's desire to extend "whipping with the wirch", to which
bas no
he above refers
in his desfatch, hat
in the draft Ordinance it would affear that be action does not restrict the meaning of whiffring to whiffing with the birch; it might " include the catale)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.